Six
Destructive Trends Happening in Your Church
Brothers and sisters, we ought to recover the roots of real
Christianity before those who care are too few to do anything useful about it.
Part of that recovery will involve identifying some of the factors that
contribute to the problem. Some of these will be difficult to consider, but we
ought to consider them anyway. Some of the problems we might explore are these:
1.
Pastors are increasingly hired for their management skills or rhetorical
ability over and above their biblical wisdom or their meeting of the biblical
qualifications for eldership.
Our shepherds are increasingly hired for their dynamic speaking
or catalytic leadership rather than their commitment to and exposition of the
Scriptures, and for their laboring in the increase in attendance rather than
the increase of gospel proclamation.
Now, of course, none of those contrasted qualities are mutually
exclusive. Pastors can be both skillful managers and biblically wise; they can
be both great speakers and great students of Scripture; and they can both
attract crowds and proclaim the gospel. The problem is that, while they are not
mutually exclusive, the latter qualities in each contrast have lost priority
and consequently have lost favor. We have not prospered theologically or
spiritually when we emphasize the professionalization of the pastorate.
2. The
equating of “worship” with just one creative portion of the weekly worship
service.
The dilution of the understanding of worship is a direct result
of the dilution of theology in the church. The applicational, topical approach
to Bible understanding has the consequence of making us think (and live) in
segmented ways. The music leader takes the stage to say, “We’re gonna start
with a time of worship.” Is the whole service not a time of worship? Isn’t the
sermon an act of worship?
Isn’t all of life meant to be an act of worship?
One reason we have struggled to develop fully devoted followers
of Jesus is that we incorrectly assign our terminology (equating worship with
music only) and thereby train our people to think in truncated, reductionistic
ways.
3. The
prevalent eisegesis in Bible study classes and small groups.
“Eisegesis” basically means “reading into the Bible.” It is the
opposite of “exegesis,” the process of examining the text and “drawing out” its
true meaning. Many leaders today either don’t have the spiritual gift of
teaching or haven’t received adequate training, and the unfortunate result is
that most of our Bible studies are rife with phrases like, “What does this text
mean to you?” as opposed to, “What does this text mean?”
Application supplants interpretation in the work of Bible study, so it has
become less important to see what the Bible means and more important to make
sure the Bible is meaningful to us.
4. The
vast gulf between the work of theology and the life of the church.
We have this notion that theology is something that takes place
somewhere “out there” in the seminaries or libraries while we here at home are
doing the real work of the Christian faith with our church programs. In many
churches, theology is seen as purely academic, the lifeless intellectual work
for the nerds in the church or, worse, the Pharisees.
5.
Biblical illiteracy.
Our people don’t know their Bible very well, and this is in
large part the fault of a generation of wispy preaching and teaching (in the
church and in the home). Connected to this factor is the church’s accommodation
and assimilation of the culture’s rapid shifting from text-based knowledge to
image-based knowledge. I’ll say more about that in the next chapter, but when
it comes to the text itself, I suspect that a lot of the superficial faith out
there results from teaching that treats the Bible like Bartlett’s
Familiar Quotations. Fortune-cookie preaching will make brittle, hollow,
syrupy Christians.
6. A
theologically lazy and methodologically consumeristic/sensationalistic approach
to the sacraments.
The rise of the “scoreboard” approach to attendance reporting,
some of the extreme examples of spontaneous baptism services, the neglect of
the Lord’s Supper or the abuse of it through fancifulness with the elements or
lack of clear directives in presenting it—these are all the result of
evangelicalism’s theological bankruptcy. We don’t think biblically about these
matters, because we’re think- ing largely along the lines of “what works?” and
consequently we might make a big splash with our productions but not produce
much faith.
The source of all of these factors, if they may be reckoned
accurate, is a fundamental misuse of the Bible by the leaders entrusted with
preaching and teaching it. And the grand result of all of these factors is that
as our churches get larger, our message keeps shrinking. We fill our buildings
with scores and scores of people, but we’ve reduced the basic message to fit
the size of an individualistic faith.
Written
by Jared C. Wilson
Culled
from
Crosswalkmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment